经过Leslie Langnau，管理编辑，@ dw_3dprinting.
最近，我不得不打电话给我的无线互联网服务提供商，因为我的互联网服务超级缓慢。客户服务代表询问我已连接到互联网的设备有多少。我回答了四个。四！显然，这至少是一个太多了。我需要升级到涡轮增压带宽，额外收费。
The office I work in also has wireless Internet service, from the same provider—it has a monopoly in our geographic area. On average, our office has about 60 to 80 devices connecting with the Internet daily. The wireless crashes frequently, so frequently that many of us choose to connect through a hardwire cable in hopes of getting more reliable Internet service. That means fewer devices trying to connect wirelessly, yet our service still crashes often.
所以我嘲笑当我听到我们要将数十亿个设备连接到互联网的互联网时。特别是对于工业IOT，许多这些设备需要可靠地传递，以免产生废料。
有没有人通知互联网服务提供商关于数据的海啸，IoT会抛弃他们？我们是否真的能够将数十亿数据传输设备连接到互联网而无需崩溃？
Just for reference: 1,024 GB = 1 TB; 1,024 TB = 1 petabyte (PB); 1,024 PB = 1 exabyte (EB); 1,024 EB = 1 zettabyte. In the year 2003, the world’s population of Internet-linked accounts created 3 EB of “information.” Today, with just Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook, we are at 1 EB. Now include individual and corporate websites. How many more exabytes will we generate once billions of devices are all connected to the IoT?
有IOT的推动者是否考虑了他们将如何管理Petabytes的数据？拥有连接工厂的制造商在他们连接所有的“自动化岛”时，在20多年前思考了这一点。它们从每个传感器中收集数据，每个芯片，每个控制器都可以传感器，传感器关闭，打开，关闭，关闭，关闭，关闭等。数据以毫秒抵达。超过90％的这些收集的数据表明了按计划运作的一切。这是当管理员质疑看到每一位数据的逻辑时。因此，仅当传感器未按计划继续执行传感器时才开始管理。
The hype of the IoT is ridiculous. Unfortunately, it is driving many decisions, including design decisions. Will more data really deliver more insight? Or will it simply drown us?
提起：评论•专家洞察那设计世界articles那无线的那无线设备
告诉我们你的想法！