Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • 流体动力
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • 领导
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

FAQ: How to choose a safety factor so a motor design lasts?

ByZak Khan|December 30, 2016

Share

Engineers determining what stepper motor and drive to use should make sure to include a safety factor. This is because there could be some unanticipated loads or operating conditions that may affect the operation of the system. On the other hand, too large a safety factor has its drawbacks as well. These include wasted power or inertia causing the system to slip out of place. As such, selecting a safety factor may not be as simple as it seems.

Most documentation and motor selection guides state that engineers should choose a safety factor of around 1.5 to 2.25. This refers to a multiplier for the amount of torque that the motor should supply and that the drive should be expected to output enough energy for.

Torque is usually one of the most critical concerns with stepper motors, along with positioning accuracy, and as such this is an important safety factor to consider.

However, there is more nuance to selecting the safety factor than any arbitrary number in the range from 1.5 to 2.25. It also depends on the system in question and what conditions the drive and motor are expected to operate under. If the system is tightly controlled and highly-tuned, then it is safer to go with a lower safety factor. That way, engineers can gain cost savings along with energy savings and reduce over-engineering. However, if the system is more uncertain, with more variable loads and operating in less than ideal conditions, such as dirty or volatile scenarios, selecting a higher safety factor is usually the safer choice. That way, in case any unexpected loads or conditions occur, the system can compensate for them instead of failing.

Additionally, remember to keep in mind the stepper motors and their drives are cyclic. That is, they cycle between various states over and over.This influences the safety factor because fatigue can become a concern under such conditions.While safety factors can help somewhat in such cases, proper consideration of fatigue comes from design and appropriate testing, not a safety factorper se.

工程师不应该依赖于安全因素,however, to ensure a well-designed system. Proper calculations and modelling the system are still vital. The safety factor is there for that, safety, and some occasional unexpected conditions. For more information, readAnaheim Automation’s Selecting a Stepper Motor System.

Motion Control Tips


Filed Under:Motion Control Tips,Motors • stepper


Related ArticlesRead More >

Conveyors support the shift to just-in-case manufacturing
What are digital twins and how are they used in industrial manufacturing?
Stepper motors feature on-board drive and control
Motion Plus now distributing MICRONIX USA products

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issueof Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Case study: How a 3D-printed tool saved thousands of hours and dollars
  • WAGO’s smartDESIGNER Online Provides Seamless Progression for Projects
  • Stop over-designing: How to save time and money with a light-duty ring
  • Five Reasons: The 2065 Connector is a Reliable Alternative to Manual Soldering
  • Disaster recovery in industrial automation starts with source control
  • HELUAKBEL – Your Source for IE Cable Solutions

Design World Podcasts

February 27, 2022
What’s next for additive software
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy|Advertising|About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • 流体动力
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • 领导
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website. OkNoRead more